🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate nuclear negotiations with the United States on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and revealed fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to resume discussions with the US government. He asserted Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Course

Araghchi is treading a complex path since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a position of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen stronger defensively and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Negotiations Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader declaring the locations had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations exercised their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was settled an local partnership with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed three times they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Situation

Iran's diplomats declared the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if discussions reopen.

Trump last week claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of international law, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the attacks started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making faith difficult to restore.

Dialogue Continues the Primary Answer

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had consistently attempted to impose their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and continues the final resolution to address disputes, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and respect, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the struggle of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the nation in the face of this assault."